User Tools

Site Tools


networking:iputils

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
networking:iputils [2018/05/26 11:46]
xose
networking:iputils [2022/01/11 01:18] (current)
xose [Links]
Line 22: Line 22:
 Also I added some utilities written from scratch, namely tracepath, arping and later rarpd (the last one does not satisfy all the criteria, I used it two or three times). Also I added some utilities written from scratch, namely tracepath, arping and later rarpd (the last one does not satisfy all the criteria, I used it two or three times).
  
-Hesitated a bit I overcame temptation to add traceroute. The variant released by LBNL to that time was mostly sane and bugs in it were mostly not specific to Linux, but main reason was that the latest version of LBNL traceroute was not small, it consisted of several files, used a wicked (and failing with Linux :-)) autoconfiguration etc. So, instead I assembled to iputils a simplistic tracepath utility and IPv6 version of traceroute, and published my patchesto LBNL traceroute separately.+Hesitated a bit I overcame temptation to add traceroute. The variant released by LBNL to that time was mostly sane and bugs in it were mostly not specific to Linux, but main reason was that the latest version of LBNL traceroute was not small, it consisted of several files, used a wicked (and failing with Linux :-)) autoconfiguration etc. So, instead I assembled to iputils a simplistic tracepath utility and IPv6 version of traceroute, and published my patches to LBNL traceroute separately.
  
-  
  
-  ​* Maintainer: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <​yoshfuji at linux-ipv6 dot org> +  * Current Version: ​20211215 ​[[https://github.com/iputils/iputils]] 
-    * Previous maintainer was Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet at ms2.inr.ac.ru>​ +
-  ​* Current Version: ​s20151218 +
-    * [[http://www.skbuff.net/iputils/]]+
  
 ====== Links ====== ====== Links ======
Line 35: Line 32:
   * Debian   * Debian
     * Bugs: [[http://​bugs.debian.org/​iputils|bugs.debian.org/​iputils]]     * Bugs: [[http://​bugs.debian.org/​iputils|bugs.debian.org/​iputils]]
-    * Package State: [[http://packages.qa.debian.org/​i/​iputils.html|packages.qa.debian.org/iputils]]+    * Package State: [[https://tracker.debian.org/​pkg/iputils]]
   * Gentoo   * Gentoo
     * Bugs: [[https://​bugs.gentoo.org/​buglist.cgi?​quicksearch=net-misc/​iputils|bugs.gentoo.org]]     * Bugs: [[https://​bugs.gentoo.org/​buglist.cgi?​quicksearch=net-misc/​iputils|bugs.gentoo.org]]
Line 41: Line 38:
   * Redhat/​Fedora   * Redhat/​Fedora
     * Bugs: [[https://​bugzilla.redhat.com/​bugzilla/​buglist.cgi?​component=iputils|bugzilla.redhat.com]]     * Bugs: [[https://​bugzilla.redhat.com/​bugzilla/​buglist.cgi?​component=iputils|bugzilla.redhat.com]]
- +    * Package State: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/iputils
-======Unofficial Forks====== +
- +
-There is an unofficial fork on github that aims to incorporate various patches from distros and lower maintenance burden for them. [[https://​marc.info/?​l=linux-netdev&​m=139816495412457|[Announce]iputils:​ maintanace fork]], git tree at [[https://github.com/iputils/iputils]]  +
networking/iputils.1527335180.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/05/26 11:46 by xose