The Linux Foundation

 
Talk:Main Page

From The Linux Foundation

(Difference between revisions)
(date: examples)
m (date)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
IMO it would be better to use one and only one standardized date format on this website. A good candidate would be the ISO 8601 date specification. [[User:Tobias Conradi|Tobias Conradi]] [[User_talk:Tobias Conradi|(Talk)]] 21:46, 21 January 2007 (PST)
 
IMO it would be better to use one and only one standardized date format on this website. A good candidate would be the ISO 8601 date specification. [[User:Tobias Conradi|Tobias Conradi]] [[User_talk:Tobias Conradi|(Talk)]] 21:46, 21 January 2007 (PST)
  
some examples of the mix here:
+
some examples of the mix here, none ISO compliant:
 
  linux-foundation.org
 
  linux-foundation.org
 
  25-Apr-2006
 
  25-Apr-2006

Revision as of 14:33, 22 January 2007

the "linux msdn"

if this meets goals & expectations, linux just won a major massive battle (imho)

date

IMO it would be better to use one and only one standardized date format on this website. A good candidate would be the ISO 8601 date specification. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:46, 21 January 2007 (PST)

some examples of the mix here, none ISO compliant:

linux-foundation.org
25-Apr-2006
January 21st, 2007
January 21, 2007
22 January 2007
11/06/06 (what is that???)
2006, November 4
linux-foundation.jp
2007-1-22

Tobias Conradi (Talk) 06:32, 22 January 2007 (PST)


[Article] [Discussion] [View source] [History]