This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
dco [2017/07/17 22:36] emsearcy reference IP policies |
dco [2017/07/17 22:48] emsearcy re-word |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* A contributor agreement may be signed by a third party, like a company, on behalf of its employees, whereas the DCO is always an attestation by the author of the contribution. | * A contributor agreement may be signed by a third party, like a company, on behalf of its employees, whereas the DCO is always an attestation by the author of the contribution. | ||
- | ===== Policy ===== | + | ===== IP policy requirements ===== |
- | In compliance with their IP policies, Linux Foundation projects MUST incorporate a mandatory mechanism to enforce the DCO on all contributions. | + | When a Linux Foundation project's IP policy requires DCO signoffs for contributions, a mechanism shall be set up to enforce them. |
- | In the contribution guidelines for each project (e.g. a CONTRIBUTING.md file) the project SHOULD make explicit that the DCO is required, and that commit sign-offs of the form ''Signed-off-by:'' are attestations according to [[https://developercertificate.org/]]. | + | In the contribution guidelines for each project (e.g. a CONTRIBUTING.md file) the project should explain the DCO requirement, and that commit sign-offs of the form ''Signed-off-by:'' are attestations according to [[https://developercertificate.org/]]. |
===== Enabling DCO enforcement ===== | ===== Enabling DCO enforcement ===== |