civilinfrastructureplatform:cip_comparison_report
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
civilinfrastructureplatform:cip_comparison_report [2019/04/09 09:07] daniel.sangorrin fix some lists |
civilinfrastructureplatform:cip_comparison_report [2019/05/14 02:12] (current) daniel.sangorrin |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== CIP Comparison report ====== | ====== CIP Comparison report ====== | ||
| - | This document compares multiple software update tools in order to implement the CIP software updates architecture. We compared them from different points of view such as: | + | This document compares software update tools that are suitable to implement the [[civilinfrastructureplatform:cip_software_updates_architecture|CIP software updates architecture]]. For a thorough comparison of open source software update tools please check the [[cip_comparison_report#comparison_references|Comparison references]] section below. We compared the tools from different points of view such as: |
| - network and storage efficiency | - network and storage efficiency | ||
| - | - ability to integrate with Debian-based build tools (Deby, ISAR, Debos) | + | - ability to integrate with Debian-based build tools used in CIP Core (e.g.: Deby, ISAR) |
| - community and member's expertise | - community and member's expertise | ||
| - | - support local and network updates | + | - support for local and remote updates |
| - security support (encryption, digital certificates, integrity) | - security support (encryption, digital certificates, integrity) | ||
| - extendable with scripts | - extendable with scripts | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| * good community: Stephano, Denx(u-boot) | * good community: Stephano, Denx(u-boot) | ||
| * CIP members experience (Siemens) | * CIP members experience (Siemens) | ||
| - | * supports yocto (meta-swupdate) and debian (on-going) | + | * supports yocto (meta-swupdate) and Debian (on-going: waiting for libubootenv replacement) |
| * low bandwidth (librsync deltas) | * low bandwidth (librsync deltas) | ||
| * u-boot interface | * u-boot interface | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| * Bad points | * Bad points | ||
| * hard to manage updates from v1 to v5 directly | * hard to manage updates from v1 to v5 directly | ||
| - | * depends on libubootenv which needs to be rebuilt for each target. | + | * depends on a u-boot library that needs to be rebuilt for each target (on-going: replacement https://github.com/sbabic/libubootenv). |
| + | * Building SWUpdate 2019.04 with [[https://github.com/Kynetics/meta-updatefactory/commit/c4c25b21d3ed4ae15f9716769c2644953e8eedb3#diff-6a1eb0b91b36c4c636f9fa5b23f5514bR53|CONFIG_UBOOT_NEWAPI]] will make use of the standalone libubootenv library, and will read default initial environment from "/etc/u-boot-initial-env". | ||
| RAUC + Casync (command) | RAUC + Casync (command) | ||
| * https://github.com/rauc/rauc | * https://github.com/rauc/rauc | ||
civilinfrastructureplatform/cip_comparison_report.1554800856.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/04/09 09:07 by daniel.sangorrin
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
