====== CIP Technical Steering Committee Meeting ====== Date: 11 June, 2018 ===== Roll Call ===== TSC members * Attendees * Agustin Benito Bethencourt (Codethink) (Representative) * Hiroshi Mine (Hitachi) * SZ Lin (MOXA) (Representative) * Masato Minda (Plat’Home) (Representative) * Takehisa Katayama (Renesas) (Voting) * Chris Paterson (Renesas) * Wolfgang Mauerer (Siemens) (Representative) (Voting) * Daniel Sangorrin (Toshiba) * Yoshi Kobayashi (Toshiba) (Representative) (Voting) - Chair * * ===== Discussions ===== ==== OSSJ ==== * AI: Prepare a Zoom meeting bridge * Schedule * [[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n4gGVFjNP7CB7pdDoRIwtNV2gDZAIgi8FQIVJqBp2OM/edit|https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n4gGVFjNP7CB7pdDoRIwtNV2gDZAIgi8FQIVJqBp2OM/edit]] * ==== Debian-LTS ==== * All paperworks has done. * Mae works for press release with Chris Lamb * Agustín encouraged CIP Members to provide the Debian LTS community a clear message that ARM64 needs to be supported in the next LTS release. * ==== Supporting Reproducible builds ==== * Here is some update might be useful to understand CII’s current status * [[https://energycommerce.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/040218-Linux-Evaluation-of-OSS-Ecosystem.pdf|https://energycommerce.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/040218-Linux-Evaluation-of-OSS-Ecosystem.pdf]] * [[https://energycommerce.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/LF-OSS-Ecosystem-Response-to-House-Energy-and-Commerce-Committee-201804233.pdf|https://energycommerce.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/LF-OSS-Ecosystem-Response-to-House-Energy-and-Commerce-Committee-201804233.pdf]] * Log from previous meeting * Any opinion? * [Agustin]: this is an important effort for CIP. I would first put effort in creating CIP core with Debian toolset. Then understanding/learning what is required to produce builds following the reproducible builds initiative at Debian. * [SZ]: Agree, maybe we can offer some human resources in this team to reduce the total cost. More information is needed. * Comment: If we fund them, we need to ask them which package need to be reproducible. * AI: Yoshi ask to Chris L. to join this discussion. * ==== IEC62443 Cyber Security Standard ==== * See cip-members mail list * Slides from IEC 62443-4 discussion * Action items * **- Comment on previous slides** * **- Analyze list, map to IEC 62443 requirements** * - Select technologies / OSS packages * - Create test cases ==== Kernel maintenance and testing ==== === Stable kernel review === * Ben asked to review and test a patch related to the watchdog subsystem * Weekly meeting through IRC to discuss technical topic * IRC: chat.freenode.net:6667/cip * Logs: https://irclogs.baserock.org/cip/ === Kernel maintenance === * Working on a new kernel release prior to OSSJ === Testing === * KernelCI vs Squad * [[https://qa-reports.linaro.org/|https://qa-reports.linaro.org/]] * [[https://github.com/Linaro/squad|https://github.com/Linaro/squad]] === Other topics === * CIP kernel talk at OSSJ under preparation. ==== CIP Core packages ==== * Work towards finalising selection? * Minimal, optimal or others? ==== Other topics ==== AI(ALL): Propose topics to be discussed in CIP F2F meeting - Jeff to send shared doc AI(Yoshi): Make sure room name for F2F meeting.